I have decided to take down this particular blog soon. The reason is not that I've seen the light and created a blog worshiping Barack Obama, but a more practical reason.
I am somewhat serious about being a writer, though my only publications as of yet are a number of poems in various little/literary zines. My current internet persona, 'nissa_amas_katoj' is often associated with my real name, particularly, in the past, in this blog.
And this blog has expressed opinions that might offend potential publishers. I will continue with my blog on science fiction and writing, The Lina Lamont Fan Club, and the Esperanto-language twin of this blog, called kaj la hundo iras kun ili will continue in that language (there is going to be a link to a translation site for those posts without English translation.)
Will I create a new internet persona and do some serious political blogging? You never can tell.....
Bye-bye,
nissa_amas_katoj
Monday, August 10, 2009
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Sarah Palin's Damn Dirty Lie
Just look at this from Mala's 'Obamanation' blog.... "Sarah Palin's Damn Dirty Lie"
Friday, July 24, 2009
Socialized Medicine and the Culture of Death don't Mix
Unless, of course, you are in Nazi Germany....
As a person without healthcare insurance I'm getting sicker and sicker of the way Our Leader and his friends are pushing socialized medicine AND the culture of death on us, without anyone mentioning some of the more troubling things...
Remember when that guy in Oregon was told that the state would not pay to treat his advanced cancer, but they WOULD pay for his assisted 'suicide'? Why are they not mentioning this in connection with the socialized medicine debate? It has ALREADY HAPPENED--- a state in the US is actively inviting people to take a poison pill to save healthcare money. And these poison pills are subsidized by the taxpayers, whether these taxpayers want to be involved in murders or not. (Murder--- that's the old-timey name for involutary assisted suicide AKA 'being rubbed out')
Why is no one asking Our Leader and his allies about this money-saving aspect of the Culture of Death? Perhaps Our Leader's fans in the media feel that we will be even more upset over it than we are over forced participation in prenatal child killing, AKA 'abortion'.
It kind of sickens me that we seem to have learned nothing from Nazi Germany. We've forgotten that once you decide that one class of person--- the severely handicapped--- should be killed, before long you are shoving masses of people on the fire for very little reason.
But there is a cure for my sickness: Sarah Palin (or some other prolife person) in the White House in 2012. That's the 'health care reform' I need....
As a person without healthcare insurance I'm getting sicker and sicker of the way Our Leader and his friends are pushing socialized medicine AND the culture of death on us, without anyone mentioning some of the more troubling things...
Remember when that guy in Oregon was told that the state would not pay to treat his advanced cancer, but they WOULD pay for his assisted 'suicide'? Why are they not mentioning this in connection with the socialized medicine debate? It has ALREADY HAPPENED--- a state in the US is actively inviting people to take a poison pill to save healthcare money. And these poison pills are subsidized by the taxpayers, whether these taxpayers want to be involved in murders or not. (Murder--- that's the old-timey name for involutary assisted suicide AKA 'being rubbed out')
Why is no one asking Our Leader and his allies about this money-saving aspect of the Culture of Death? Perhaps Our Leader's fans in the media feel that we will be even more upset over it than we are over forced participation in prenatal child killing, AKA 'abortion'.
It kind of sickens me that we seem to have learned nothing from Nazi Germany. We've forgotten that once you decide that one class of person--- the severely handicapped--- should be killed, before long you are shoving masses of people on the fire for very little reason.
But there is a cure for my sickness: Sarah Palin (or some other prolife person) in the White House in 2012. That's the 'health care reform' I need....
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Kim Jong-Il's Surname is Not 'Jong-Il'
Stupidity again in news channel headlines--- the news channel has referred to North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il as 'Jong-Il' as if that were his surname instead of his given name. Gee, I knew Asian names were 'backwards' as far as the order of surname and given name back when I was about nine.
And this boo-boo wasn't even a funny one as when they referred to Adolf Hitler as the German 'furor' instead of 'Fuehrer'.
And this boo-boo wasn't even a funny one as when they referred to Adolf Hitler as the German 'furor' instead of 'Fuehrer'.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Obama's (indirect) Energy Tax on the Poor
Obama promised during his campaign not to raise taxes on the poor and middle class. But Our Leader doesn't really feel the need to keep his promises on that score. It's more important to him to please the environmentistas by destroying the coal industry. And he did promise during his campaign to destroy the coal industry, remember? Voters have only themselves to blame for not researching this man before voting him into office.
Of course Obama's also promising the poor all sorts of socialist-state benefits, but just because he skyrockets our power bills and makes us all poorer doesn't mean he's going to be able to deliver these benefits. And as far as the healthcare-for-all is concerned, given Our Leader's pro-death stance on abortion, supporting not only abortion through all nine months as in Roe v. Wade, but also the killing by medical neglect of babies born after abortion, isn't it likely that if you get advanced cancer you are more likely to get a suicide pill from Obamacare than treatment? And what if you are older? An advocate of futile care theory suggests that 'futile care' is giving a mammogram to an 80 year old woman. My mother is an 80 year old breast cancer survivor, she should not have to beg for mammograms or for treatment if her cancer recurs. It would save a lot of money to Obamacare if patients like her died--- preferably the day after they stopped working and bringing money into the system--- but some of us still believe that human life matters.
I've searched through my copy of the constitution over and over, and I don't see where destroying the coal industry or any other American businesses is the duty of the President. It's just another power grab. And it's one in favor of the Global Warming myth, which is defended by true believers not with logical arguments but by ad hominem attacks and chants of the mantra 'the science is settled'. 'Science' in this case being a euphemism for 'the dogma of the environmentista faith' since Real Science is never 'settled' but is always open to correction when more and better data is obtained.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
gvzuh39rc7
Of course Obama's also promising the poor all sorts of socialist-state benefits, but just because he skyrockets our power bills and makes us all poorer doesn't mean he's going to be able to deliver these benefits. And as far as the healthcare-for-all is concerned, given Our Leader's pro-death stance on abortion, supporting not only abortion through all nine months as in Roe v. Wade, but also the killing by medical neglect of babies born after abortion, isn't it likely that if you get advanced cancer you are more likely to get a suicide pill from Obamacare than treatment? And what if you are older? An advocate of futile care theory suggests that 'futile care' is giving a mammogram to an 80 year old woman. My mother is an 80 year old breast cancer survivor, she should not have to beg for mammograms or for treatment if her cancer recurs. It would save a lot of money to Obamacare if patients like her died--- preferably the day after they stopped working and bringing money into the system--- but some of us still believe that human life matters.
I've searched through my copy of the constitution over and over, and I don't see where destroying the coal industry or any other American businesses is the duty of the President. It's just another power grab. And it's one in favor of the Global Warming myth, which is defended by true believers not with logical arguments but by ad hominem attacks and chants of the mantra 'the science is settled'. 'Science' in this case being a euphemism for 'the dogma of the environmentista faith' since Real Science is never 'settled' but is always open to correction when more and better data is obtained.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
gvzuh39rc7
Thursday, June 25, 2009
She's not a Health Care System, She's my Doctor
Obama's socialized-medicine propaganda campaign has acheived one victory already--- they have gotten everyone, even Republicans, to talk about our 'health care system'. What 'health care system'? In the US, we have DOCTORS. Some are in a private practice, some are in hospitals, some are in a practice owned by a medical care business. THEY get to decide what kind of medicine they want to practice, where and with whom.
My doctor is actually a nurse practitioner. She works for a medical business based, I think, in Green Bay WI, but with offices in Marinette, WI. When I need to go to the doctor, we pay cash for a doctor's visit. I have looked into buying private health insurance, but since the monthly premium is about what I spend in a year on office visits, it's kind of on the back burner.
The big threat to my doctor is not the vast unwashed/uninsured masses. It is LAWYERS. Some lawyers--- like John Edwards--- make a career out of wrongfully suing doctors. Edwards told his juries that children with cerebral palsy are caused by doctors waiting too long to perform caesarian sections--- you know, because the mother chooses not to be cut up unless necessary? Science has since shown that cerebral palsy starts earlier than this point and the doctors were innocent. But no one is making Edwards give the money he earned unjustly back.
What is needed is not 'health care reform', but lawsuit reform. Lawyers should not be able to take on clients without pay, and then collect 50% of the money a jury awards to the client. Malpractice lawsuits should only be allowed when there is real evidence the doctor did something wrong, not just because there was a bad outcome. And if Obama gets to decide how much corporate execs get paid, why isn't someone capping the income of lawyers?
If doctors only had to pay small amounts of malpractice insurance because lawsuit reform had been accomplished, they could afford to charge smaller fees. They could take on more poor patients who couldn't pay the full price for an office visit (my doctor's office has a sliding scale of fees).
But that would turn doctors back into doctors and free citizens, and what is wanted is to make all doctors cogs in the 'health care system' machine.
My doctor is actually a nurse practitioner. She works for a medical business based, I think, in Green Bay WI, but with offices in Marinette, WI. When I need to go to the doctor, we pay cash for a doctor's visit. I have looked into buying private health insurance, but since the monthly premium is about what I spend in a year on office visits, it's kind of on the back burner.
The big threat to my doctor is not the vast unwashed/uninsured masses. It is LAWYERS. Some lawyers--- like John Edwards--- make a career out of wrongfully suing doctors. Edwards told his juries that children with cerebral palsy are caused by doctors waiting too long to perform caesarian sections--- you know, because the mother chooses not to be cut up unless necessary? Science has since shown that cerebral palsy starts earlier than this point and the doctors were innocent. But no one is making Edwards give the money he earned unjustly back.
What is needed is not 'health care reform', but lawsuit reform. Lawyers should not be able to take on clients without pay, and then collect 50% of the money a jury awards to the client. Malpractice lawsuits should only be allowed when there is real evidence the doctor did something wrong, not just because there was a bad outcome. And if Obama gets to decide how much corporate execs get paid, why isn't someone capping the income of lawyers?
If doctors only had to pay small amounts of malpractice insurance because lawsuit reform had been accomplished, they could afford to charge smaller fees. They could take on more poor patients who couldn't pay the full price for an office visit (my doctor's office has a sliding scale of fees).
But that would turn doctors back into doctors and free citizens, and what is wanted is to make all doctors cogs in the 'health care system' machine.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Vote for 'Team Sarah' on digg
Team Sarah on digg. Go to digg and help spread the word about Team Sarah by 'digging' it.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
